Menu

争议融资

The smart choice for organisations to turn cases into cash flow

Got a strong claim (or claims) you aren’t pursuing because of the likely costs – or the risk of not winning? Tying up company money pursuing legal cases in these straightened times can be avoided using dispute financing – an increasingly popular way to pay for the cost of pursuing disputes by using a third party.

Clyde & Co is a leading global law firm specialising in the transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance sectors. We have formed an association with LCM, a specialist in providing commercially viable tailored litigation finance. Together, our advisory services help clients create new business opportunities, de-risk litigation and release resources back into the business.


How does disputes funding work?

In a funded dispute you pay nothing towards legal fees as the case progresses – these are paid by a third-party lender who has no direct interest in the litigation. When the case is successful, the lender receives its investment back, plus a pre-agreed margin that reflects the risk incurred. You get all the rest. If the case is unsuccessful, the lender gets nothing.

Key benefits:

  • Reduced financial risk
  • Preservation of cash for operating activities, rather than dispute resolution
  • Provision of adverse cost indemnities
  • Dispute costs are removed from the P&L and balance sheet “drag” is eliminated
  • Funding is non-recourse

Find out more about our Disputes Funding offering

Download the brochure

Funded portfolio

Traditionally, funders have financed single, isolated claims. Funding of a single claim carries a high degree of risk for the funder because if that claim is unsuccessful the funder will not recover its investment.

Multiple claims can be packaged into a portfolio and the financial risk for the funder is diversified across the book resulting in lower capital risk and therefore a lower return charged by the funder.

How it works:

  • A portfolio typically consists of a minimum of three claims
  • The funding costs for a portfolio are lower due to the decreased risk profile relative to a single case
  • Cases may be added into a portfolio over time and the funding facility can be adjusted accordingly. A framework agreement can be created with just one case
  • A portfolio can comprise different types of cases and include low value claims as well as defence cases

Related Insights

Related Services

航空

航空

商事争议

商事争议

能源与自然资源

能源与自然资源

保险和再保险

保险和再保险

航运

航运

项目和建筑工程

项目和建筑工程

房地产

房地产

贸易与商品

贸易与商品



Contact us for more information

Sapna Jhangiani QC
Sapna Jhangiani QC

Partner

Ben Knowles
Ben Knowles

Partner

Hery Frédéric Ranjeva
Hery Frédéric Ranjeva

Partner

Maurice Thompson
Maurice Thompson

Partner