Full Profile
Daniel Pammer focuses his practice in the areas of insurance, reinsurance, coverage and litigation. He has experience defending insured and self-insured clients in toxic tort, product liability, premises liability and personal injury matters around the country. Additionally, Daniel has issued coverage advise to domestic and international insurers in providing primary, excess, and reinsurance coverage to municipalities and churches as well as both first-party and third-party Covid-19 claims.
Prior to joining Clyde & Co, Daniel focused his practice on product liability, personal injury, and complex mass tort litigation. He has participated in jury trials in Illinois, Georgia, Philadelphia, New York, and Washington. Daniel has argued numerous motions and taken depositions throughout the United States.
Daniel lives in the Chicago area with his wife, son, and daughter, along with their two Italian mastiffs.
Admissions
- Illinois
- Missouri
- New York State
- Wisconsin
- US District Courts for the Northern, Central, and Southern Districts of Illinois
- US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Education
- J.D., cum laude, Northern Illinois University College of Law, 2014
- B.A., Finance, Northern Illinois University College of Business, 2011
Memberships
- Chicago Bar Association
- American Bar Association
Experience
- Obtained summary disposition and multiple sanctions motions in favor of insurer during a dispute regarding professional liability insurance, which was affirmed by the Wisconsin Appellate Court.
- Clevenger v. Bartells Asbestos Settlement Trust, et al., Seattle, Washington, 2018. In this five-week wrongful death trial, Daniel and his team represented a sealing equipment manufacturer. Plaintiff requested USD 36 million during closing arguments. The jury returned a defense verdict.
- Pridemore v. Special Electric Company, Inc., et al., Madison County, Illinois, 2016. During this three-week wrongful death trial, Daniel and his team represented a wholesale supplier. The case was resolved favorably on the eve of closing arguments.
