Pratiques professionnelles
Recours abusif écarté : l’immunité des conseils de discipline réaffirmée
Cliquez sur chaque termes pour accéder aux articles correspondants
Notre équipe en responsabilité professionnelle a une vaste expérience de la défense des entreprises de services professionnels. Il s'agit aussi bien de petits litiges où le contrôle des dépenses est une priorité, que de litiges complexes de grande envergure, représentant plusieurs millions de dollars.
Nous avons l'expérience nécessaire pour conseiller les entreprises sur la manière de gérer les demandes d'indemnisation à forte visibilité et sensibles d'un point de vue réputationnel. Nous travaillons avec des équipes de gestion des risques et des spécialistes de la communication afin de minimiser les retombées de ces litiges.
Nous pouvons également aider à la mise en place d'accords d'assurance et de réassurance pour répondre aux besoins des réseaux professionnels dans le cadre de différents régimes juridiques et réglementaires.
Nos avocats peuvent également conseiller les conseils d'administration et les membres sur toute une série de questions relatives à la responsabilité des dirigeants, en mettant à profit notre compréhension des lacunes qui peuvent apparaître entre les différentes formes de couverture de responsabilité offertes aux entreprises de services professionnels.
Successfully defended a notable and valuable stress at work/protection from harassment claim on behalf of a large corporate entity resulting in nil damages and substantial recovery of defence costs.
Providing strategic advice to the ABI and its members following the MoJ consultation into mesothelioma claims.
Acting on behalf of Ladbrokes in the recent Court of Appeal case of Nicholls v Ladbrokes (2013) ECWA Civ 1963, a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder case involving allegations of negligence and breach of statutory duty following an armed robbery.
We successfully defended the Defendant in the case of Marian Holloway v Tyne Thames Technology Ltd, in which a UK court considered de minimis issues in a noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) case. This was a significant and positive decision for insurers continuing to face an unprecedented surge in deafness claims.
Acting on behalf of a Local Authority in the Mesothelioma Trigger Litigation in the Supreme Court leading to a successful judgment that policies of Employers liability insurance will respond for injuries sustained or contracted at the date of inhalation of asbestos. BAI (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) v Durham [2012] UKSC 14.
Successfully defended a notable and valuable stress at work/protection from harassment claim on behalf of a large corporate entity resulting in nil damages and substantial recovery of defence costs.
Providing strategic advice to the ABI and its members following the MoJ consultation into mesothelioma claims.
Acting on behalf of Ladbrokes in the recent Court of Appeal case of Nicholls v Ladbrokes (2013) ECWA Civ 1963, a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder case involving allegations of negligence and breach of statutory duty following an armed robbery.
We successfully defended the Defendant in the case of Marian Holloway v Tyne Thames Technology Ltd, in which a UK court considered de minimis issues in a noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) case. This was a significant and positive decision for insurers continuing to face an unprecedented surge in deafness claims.
Acting on behalf of a Local Authority in the Mesothelioma Trigger Litigation in the Supreme Court leading to a successful judgment that policies of Employers liability insurance will respond for injuries sustained or contracted at the date of inhalation of asbestos. BAI (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) v Durham [2012] UKSC 14.
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
Show more