Assurance et réassurance
High Court to Clarify Future Care Damages in Catastrophic Injury Case
Cliquez sur chaque termes pour accéder aux articles correspondants
Notre équipe possède une grande expérience dans le traitement des réclamations contre les intermédiaires en assurance, y compris les courtiers de Lloyd et les autres. Nous avons prodigué des conseils sur un large éventail de questions, y compris l’étendue du devoir de diligence à l’égard des clients et des compagnies d’assurance, les questions complexes de causalité et de perte, et l’application d’un pouvoir exécutoire. De surcroît, nous sommes fréquemment sollicités pour aider nos clients dans le cadre de réclamations d’erreurs et d’omissions découlant de pertes d’exploitation. Bien que ces réclamations soient un problème depuis longtemps, ce ne sont pas les nouvelles réclamations qui manquent.
Nous comprenons le cadre réglementaire qui s’applique aux intermédiaires d’assurance et pouvons aider les courtiers et leurs compagnies d’assurance à traiter ces questions connexes.
En raison de la nature de plus en plus internationale des risques auxquels les professionnels font face, nous défendons des cabinets dans le monde entier. Grâce à nos compétences en matière de responsabilité professionnelle dans les principaux territoires, nous pouvons conseiller nos clients partout où leurs activités se déroulent.
Successfully defended a notable and valuable stress at work/protection from harassment claim on behalf of a large corporate entity resulting in nil damages and substantial recovery of defence costs.
Providing strategic advice to the ABI and its members following the MoJ consultation into mesothelioma claims.
Acting on behalf of Ladbrokes in the recent Court of Appeal case of Nicholls v Ladbrokes (2013) ECWA Civ 1963, a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder case involving allegations of negligence and breach of statutory duty following an armed robbery.
We successfully defended the Defendant in the case of Marian Holloway v Tyne Thames Technology Ltd, in which a UK court considered de minimis issues in a noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) case. This was a significant and positive decision for insurers continuing to face an unprecedented surge in deafness claims.
Acting on behalf of a Local Authority in the Mesothelioma Trigger Litigation in the Supreme Court leading to a successful judgment that policies of Employers liability insurance will respond for injuries sustained or contracted at the date of inhalation of asbestos. BAI (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) v Durham [2012] UKSC 14.
Successfully defended a notable and valuable stress at work/protection from harassment claim on behalf of a large corporate entity resulting in nil damages and substantial recovery of defence costs.
Providing strategic advice to the ABI and its members following the MoJ consultation into mesothelioma claims.
Acting on behalf of Ladbrokes in the recent Court of Appeal case of Nicholls v Ladbrokes (2013) ECWA Civ 1963, a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder case involving allegations of negligence and breach of statutory duty following an armed robbery.
We successfully defended the Defendant in the case of Marian Holloway v Tyne Thames Technology Ltd, in which a UK court considered de minimis issues in a noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) case. This was a significant and positive decision for insurers continuing to face an unprecedented surge in deafness claims.
Acting on behalf of a Local Authority in the Mesothelioma Trigger Litigation in the Supreme Court leading to a successful judgment that policies of Employers liability insurance will respond for injuries sustained or contracted at the date of inhalation of asbestos. BAI (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) v Durham [2012] UKSC 14.
Consultant
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
See more